View Single Post
Old 08-19-2016   #7
Funk*Sonic*7
Im super cereal!
 
Funk*Sonic*7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Randomly by chance out of nowhere, b/c that's more plausible
Posts: 3,748
Rep Power: 61
Funk*Sonic*7 has a reputation beyond reputeFunk*Sonic*7 has a reputation beyond reputeFunk*Sonic*7 has a reputation beyond reputeFunk*Sonic*7 has a reputation beyond reputeFunk*Sonic*7 has a reputation beyond reputeFunk*Sonic*7 has a reputation beyond reputeFunk*Sonic*7 has a reputation beyond reputeFunk*Sonic*7 has a reputation beyond reputeFunk*Sonic*7 has a reputation beyond reputeFunk*Sonic*7 has a reputation beyond reputeFunk*Sonic*7 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Case Closed - Kim Davis Has Won the Fight for Religious Freedom Aug 19, 2016

The reason the homosexual activists had to co-opt the term "marriage" is because there is no comparable term referring to same-sex unions -- because they aren't unions, aren't complements in the same way, and have never been acknowledged as such (nor as inherently vital to the well-being of society) by any society except by way of an Orwellian, top-down requirement that everyone affirm an oxymoron. The real civil rights movement never required that everyone refer to black people as "white.

The interracial marriage ban enforced the separation of men from women, based on race. It used marriage policy to keep the sexes away from each other, in certain instances.

Same sex "marriage" is doing something similar. It does not enforce a separation, but it does endorse and foster a separation of men from women, based on on fraudulent claims of so-called "sexual orientation." Sexual orientation?! So, we all supposedly have a "sexual orientation?" Where is it located? On the liver? The ear lobe? The pancreas? If we have a "sexual orientation" why can't doctors identify our "sexual orientation" when we are born? "Sexual orientation" is the biggest hoax of our time! It is the "royal robes" of H. C. Anderson's "The Emperor's New Clothes." People pretend it exists, so they will appear to be "intelligent." The problem is that there is NO evidence for its existence. Do I get it at Walmart in a bucket? The ONLY scientifically observable elements of sexuality are the sexual organs. All other "elements" are purely speculative. I can go see "Avatar" at a theater and for 90 minutes to two hours believe in a fantasy world; but, when I leave the theater I am back in the real world. Same-sex advocates have created a fantasy world of "sexual orientation" that doesn't exist in reality; but, unfortunately many are buying into the fantasy. The burden of proof is on science to show that "sexual orientation" is real. That is, empirical evidence that homosexual practice and same sex attraction disorder is a uniform attribute across individuals, that sexual attraction never fluctuates, and homosexual desires and inclinations can easily be measured.

""Sexual orientation” is a term without clinical or legal definition. No resolution or draft law should be considered by the United Nations or any government unless it contains a clear definition of this term. If the proponents of “sexual orientation” refuse to define the term, know then that their intent is less than forthright, that they are not being honest about its implications and unintended consequences, and that their purpose is not simply to prevent discrimination." http://takebackcanada.com/22orientations.html

I understand that "sexual orientation" refers to romantic or sexual preference. So what scientific method is used to show that "sexual orientation" is real? That is, what is the empirical evidence that homosexuality is a uniform attribute across individuals, has it's own DNA, that sexual attraction never fluctuates, and homosexuality can easily be measured? Where is it located? On the liver? The ear lobe? The pancreas? If we have a "sexual orientation" why can't doctors identify our "sexual orientation" when we are born? Do I get it at Walmart in a bucket? What are the scientifically observable elements of sexuality besides the sexual organs and the chemical and hormonal processes that flow from it? And does proof of "sexual orientation" mean that the behavior that flows from it, should be affirmed, encouraged? If "sexual orientation" is no different than say race (skin color) and homosexual sex is a result of homosexual attraction when acted out, can you please tell us what behavior black skin color results in when acted out? If "sexual orientation" exists, can you please show me a picture of one? If it is invisible, what kind of instrument do you use to measure it? Electricity is measured by voltage meters. Thoughts can be measured with lie detector devices and with medical equipment. Meteorologists have instruments to measure wind. Where's the MRI and/or CAT scan data for "sexual orientation? Can you really not see you have place blind faith into something very abstract and highly ambiguous? Can you really not see that "sexual orientation" is a concept in which it takes more faith than logic and reason to believe in? Can you not see that "sexual orientation" is essentially their magic skydaddy?

A meta-study of nearly 200 peer-reviewed studies on so-called "sexual orientation" and gender identity, carried out by three Johns Hopkins scholars, was released today that "shows that some of the most frequently heard claims about sexuality and gender are not supported by scientific evidence." Among other things, it "questions the scientific basis of trends in the treatment of children who do not identify with their biological sex," only a minority of whom continue to express "gender-atypical" thoughts or behavior into adolescence and adulthood. Thus, there is "no evidence that all such children should be encouraged to become transgender, much less subjected to hormone treatments or surgery." The report also finds scientific evidence wanting for the theory that "gender identity is an innate, fixed property of human beings that is independent of biological sex — that a person might be ‘a man trapped in a woman’s body’ or ‘a woman trapped in a man’s body.’"

http://www.thenewatlantis.com/public...r-50-fall-2016

Anyway, so-called "sexual orientation" is using marriage policy to encourage the sexes to separate from each other, in certain instances.

Same sex "marriage" supporters claim to be “on the right side of history.” But as Loving v. Virginia shows us, history did NOT side with those who were using marriage policy in order to separate the sexes from each other."

Same sex "marriage" is an endorsement of homosexual behavior, which is a promotion of a relationship that discourages men and women to marry. The reasons may be different, but the effect is the same. So does it or does it not (same sex "marriage") endorse or promote the idea of same sex couples, same sex love, same sex sex, as the same or equal to man-woman marriage? SSM, by its very definition, separates males from females.

http://www.ruthblog.org/2014/07/30/d...history-claim/

Also, if you are *for* redefining marriage, in a way you are enabling the negative outcomes of abuse. Not only the founder of the "marriage equality" movement homosexual activists Larry Brinkin was a detestable racist child abuser himself (Google Larry Brinkin), you may want to consider this...

http://m.sfgate.com/news/article/Lar...se-5162743.php

Founder of HRC (euphemistically called "Human Rights Campaign"), homosexual activist organization that is the leading advocacy group for redefining marriage, was arrested for sex with minor...

http://www.advocate.com/crime/2014/1...crimes-charges ;

Listen to what this homosexual activist Masha Gessen says about marriage as an institution and especially pay attention to what comments receives the loudest applause... https://youtu.be/n9M0xcs2Vw4

Homosexual activist Masha Gessen advocates that all of the adults should be legal parents, not just the natural mother and father. So instead of the older half-sister living between (only!) two homes from the time she was three years old, she would live between three or more homes. Would adults ever choose to spend years living like that? Of course not. That is one example of the new kind of family breakdown."
__________________
"God is the shaper of your heart. God does not display his work in abstract terms. He prefers the concrete, and this means that at the end of your life one of three things will happen to your heart: it will grow hard, it will be broken, or it will be tender. Nobody escapes." - Ravi Zacharias

Last edited by Funk*Sonic*7; 08-22-2016 at 12:40 PM.
Funk*Sonic*7 is offline   Reply With Quote