View Single Post
Old 11-15-2017   #2
Funk*Sonic*7
Im super cereal!
 
Funk*Sonic*7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Randomly by chance out of nowhere, b/c that's more plausible
Posts: 3,748
Rep Power: 60
Funk*Sonic*7 has a reputation beyond reputeFunk*Sonic*7 has a reputation beyond reputeFunk*Sonic*7 has a reputation beyond reputeFunk*Sonic*7 has a reputation beyond reputeFunk*Sonic*7 has a reputation beyond reputeFunk*Sonic*7 has a reputation beyond reputeFunk*Sonic*7 has a reputation beyond reputeFunk*Sonic*7 has a reputation beyond reputeFunk*Sonic*7 has a reputation beyond reputeFunk*Sonic*7 has a reputation beyond reputeFunk*Sonic*7 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Australia, Please Do the Right Thing On the Marriage Issue

Laws teach society bad or good behavior. A bad law teaches society over time, if not immediately, that that bad behavior is actually a positive good. For example, Roe v Wade has taught society that killing babies in the womb is a positive good, and as a result, over 60 million babies in the womb have been slaughtered since that decision in 1973 just in the United States alone. So much for that so-called back alley coathanger epidemic the Left lied and continues to lie about. It certainly has that "boogeyman in the closet" effect, even though there never was and will never be a boogeyman. The states wrongly decided to treat that court opinion (all made by men who the Left usually argue are typically not allowed to have a say on the matter, by the way) as "law of the land" when they didn't and still don't have to. There has never been a worse genocide in the history of our world as far as we know.

Unfortunately Australia voted to remove biological truth (connections, roots, and complimentarity) from the legal definition of marriage.
Here is a prime example of the consequences of such unjust laws...Commercial surrogacy...

The problem with surrogacy, is that there is never a right ruling, because the practice itself destroys motherhood. Is the mother the genetic parent who contributed the egg? The one who’s voice and smell the child knows from its first moments of life through birth? Or in this case, the woman who nurtured the baby and loved him (or her) for the first 18 months of his life? Also, how preposterous for a judge to “assign” this child the identity of being a child of same sex "parents." This child’s identity isn’t determined by a judge. It’s determined by the nature of being human: the identity that says that children have a right to their mother and father, should not be manufactured into existence, should not be bought and sold, and should not have their primal need for maternal love parsed into three different women. Surrogacy redefines what it means to be a human child. They are no longer vulnerable humans whose rights need to be respected and protected, but rather commodities to be selected, purchased and awarded to whatever adults the State decides should have them...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...and-child-gay/

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/ren...5dcfea18b58bbe

So in Australia, people voted 61% yes to 38% no. (Keep in mind, 60% of 80 % of the population voted to change the law. That is 48% of the population. That means 52% of the population did not vote to change the law). The NO campaign warned people over and over again that forced compliance of everything homosexual and gender confusion will become much more compulsory within just about every cultural institution if the "yes" vote wins. If I were them, I would keep a meticulous record of these occurrences and keep fighting the good fight, just as the pro-Life movement has been doing since Roe v Wade in 1973. Why? Because, among other things the "love is love" soundbite is a euphemism, it's a misnomer, and it's logic has to apply to any and all claimed to be consenting relationship in order for it to be consistent revealing them to either be morally and ethically repugnant if they accept these logical conclusions or a complete hypocrite beyond believe (something they often accuse their opposition of) if they don't accept that logical conclusion.

What is Real love? #TruthisLove

http://www.massresistance.org/docs/m...ts_of_ssm.html

What's changed since marriage was redefined in the U.K...


https://www.spectator.com.au/2017/09...-sex-marriage/


How redefining marriage has affected Canada just 10 years later...


http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2012/11/6758/


How redefining marriage has impacted the United States and also more concerning Canada...


https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/qed/...to-zimmermann/

But We Do Not Despair...

https://billmuehlenberg.com/2017/11/...marriage-vote/

Edit: As you can see from the responses below, apathy, ad hominem, and lack of critical thinking is a problem in our society.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 19510470_10212769039599886_3894920603637316171_n.jpg (18.1 KB, 0 views)
__________________
"God is the shaper of your heart. God does not display his work in abstract terms. He prefers the concrete, and this means that at the end of your life one of three things will happen to your heart: it will grow hard, it will be broken, or it will be tender. Nobody escapes." - Ravi Zacharias

Last edited by Funk*Sonic*7; 11-20-2017 at 06:53 AM.
Funk*Sonic*7 is offline   Reply With Quote